Galaxies Dancing the Tango

Interacting galaxies come in all shapes and sizes.  This pair, known as Arp 237 or UGC-1810 and UGC-1813 bear a striking resemblance to a flower – a rose as stated on the Hubble siteis even more precise.

Galaxies Colliding UGC-1810 and 1813: Image Courtesy of Hubble Site

 (Link to larger images)

     The blue “icing”at the top of the image are hot blue stars that have formed in the wake of the collision.  You can also see a region of new star formation in the center of the smaller galaxy, also most likely due to the collision.

     But, there are jewels strewn all about in this image: A small blue galaxy to the left of the larger UGC-1810 and a red spiral galaxy visible between its arms to the lower right.

         Blue Galaxy     Red Galaxy

   This clip will show you where the galaxies are and zoom in to them.  But, if you can, download the largest image possible, zoom in and explore this beautiful image.

    It is also noteworthy that this image commemorates Hubble’s 21st anniversary of operation in space.  It’s hard to imagine that is has been that long!

     A note about housekeeping on the site.  I’ve categorized the blog posts so it will be easier if you are looking for a particular post to search by category.  The categories used are listed at the bottom of the post and you can click on them to sort the blog.  They are also listed on the right side of the web page.

  • Astronomy
  • Cosmology
  • Galaxy
  • Humans in Space
  • Orbital Maneuvers
  • Solar System

Hopefully this will be of use to you in the future.

Till next time,

RC Davison

Star Destroyed by Black Hole?

The science of astronomy is fascinating in that it involves some of the most bizarre concepts in nature.   But, it can be one of the most frustrating fields of study because we must do everything at a distance.  We can’t touch a star.  We can’t see the evolution of most events in the cosmos because the time they take far exceeds our meager lifetimes. (That is, short of an event like a supernova.) Everything we know about the cosmos has been learned by observation via the electromagnetic spectrum, historically in the visible wavelengths and today we cover the entire electromagnetic spectrum.   It is with these observations, coupled with a basic understanding of physics and chemistry learned on Earth, along with theories developed by some very intelligent people that have led to new discoveries in the cosmos.

It has been theorized that stars that orbit a black hole, (like the ones that move around the black hole at the center of our galaxy) may eventually be pulled into the black hole.   This unfortunate star would be ripped apart by the tidal forces exerted on it from the black hole, and its remains would be pulled past the event horizon into the waiting singularity.  This star stuff would release tremendous amounts of energy as it spiraled down into the black hole, moving faster and faster and approaching relativistic speeds.  This energy would be radiated away from the black hole in high energy jets that are perpendicular to the disk of debris falling into the black hole.   This is theory.  We haven’t actually seen this happen – yet.

An event that was documented on March 28, 2011 by the Swift gamma-ray telescope (gamma-ray burst (GRB) 110328A), followed up in the visual part of the spectrum by the Hubble telescope and finally confirmed by the Chandra X-ray telescope may have identified such an event.   The object located in a galaxy 3.8 billion lightyears (ly) from us in the constellation of Draco, visible from the northern hemisphere.   This is what Swift, Hubble and finally Chandra saw as they hunted down the source of the gamma rays:

Swift, Hubble and Chandra's view of gamma-ray source.  Image courtesy of HubbleSite.org

(HubbleSite.org)

       The Swift telescope picked up on a gamma-ray flash and documented a series of flashes, which instead of getting dimmer actually got more intense.   This is not typically seen. When a star goes supernova it emits an enormous burst of energy that fades over the a period of 3-4 weeks or more as indicated in the graph below.

Supernova light curve - Image courtesy of NASA

      What Swift saw was this:

Light curve from gamma-ray source seen by Swiift - Image courtesy of NASA

(HubbleSite.org)

      Distinctly different.   If the theory is correct then we are seeing these bursts of energy because the orientation of the black hole relative to Earth is such that these jets point our way.

The proposed scenario that matches up with the observation is depicted in the image below:

Star being destroyed by black hole - Image courtesy of HubbleSite.org

(HubbleSite.org )

      Frustratingly, we can’t see this!  We can only surmise from the data that this is what is happening at the core of this galaxy 3.8 billion ly away.   But, imagine what it must have looked like to see this star in its final death throws as it passed the black hole for the last time…

Till next time,

RC Davison

A Gossamer Galaxy – NGC 4921

There are jewels in the night sky and some of them are more fanciful than others. The spiral galaxy NGC 4921 is a case in point. Please click on the following links in the article for much higher resolution images. (Click for a larger image.)

NGC 4921 Image Courtesy of Hubble/ESA

This beautiful barred-spiral galaxy resembles more a ghostly cosmic jelly fish than the typical spiral galaxy you may think of like the Whirlpool galaxy (M101) below:

Whirlpool Galaxy - Image Courtesy of Adam Block, Mt. Lemmon SkyCenter, U Arizona

You’ll notice immediately that NGC 4921 is missing the well defined spiral arms seen in the Whirlpool. There is structure there, but it is much more subtle.  You do see a dark swirl of dust around the core, accented with bright blue stars that are forming along this band.  And, you can see the bar that extends across the nucleus of the galaxy as well as some spiral structure to the arms.

To me, what is most remarkable about this galaxy is that the white gossamer cloud is not dust but stars – billions and billions of unresolved stars spread very uniformly around the galaxy.  In a well defined spiral galaxy we don’t get the same impression of the vast number of stars contained within because they are clumped together in the arms.  NGC 4921 and the Whirlpool galaxies are roughly the same size (about 200,000 lightyears verses 175,000 lightyears across), so comparing the two galaxies gives a good sense of how many stars are condensed into the arms.  It is interesting that this type of galaxy is termed an “anaemic spiral” because of the uniform distribution of stars.

The galaxy is located about 320 million lightyears away in the galaxy cluster known as the Coma Cluster or alternatively Abell 1656 in the constellation Coma Berenices.  If you look closely at the image you will see thousands of galaxies scattered about NGC 4921 and even behind the nebulous galaxy.  Some are part of the Coma Cluster, while others extend much further beyond it.  This annotated image below (Click for a larger image.) shows highlights some of the details contained in this amazing image.

NGC 4921 Annotated Image Courtesy of Hubble/ESA

     Check out the Hubble website for more information, images and several short videos that will give you more in-depth information about this beautiful jewel of the night sky.   Enjoy the wonders of the Cosmos!

Till next time,

RC Davison

On Japan and Other Thoughts

I am still trying to comprehend the magnitude of the disaster that has afflicted Japan on the 11thof March. My thoughts are with all of those that are trying to pick up the pieces of their lives and put them all back together again. It is at these times that all the trappings of modern society are worthless. One’s main concern is for family, friends, food and shelter.

     In an effort to help support the relief effort in Japan, I will donate all proceeds from sales of Orbital Maneuvers from now (March 26, 2011) until the summer solstice on June 21st .  The more books sold, the more I’ll be able to contribute.

I’m going to rant here. Be forewarned!

When I watched the images coming out of Japan after the disaster, I could not shake the feeling that we should be more prepared. We, us, everyone on this planet. World wide for 2011 we will spend over two trillion dollars on defense. Defense of our sovereign lands from those who wish to attack us.

We are missing the big picture here. What we can do to each other pales in comparison to what Mother Nature can throw at us. Look at what just happened in Japan. What about hurricane Katrina’s devastation of New Orleans and the Gulf coast. The earthquake and tsunami that hit Indonesia in 2004 and the earthquake in China in 2008. The list goes on. But, these are small events compared to some of the major events that have occurred in the past, from super-volcanoes erupting to asteroid impacts.

Maybe we should start thinking more along the line of joining forces. After all, it is 2011, the 21st century. Should we not be civilized by this point? We’ve had over 10,000 years of development and yet we are constantly focused on beating each other into submission. Be it for religious, political, ideological or territorial reasons.

I know I’m being too idealistic here, but we should stop pointing missiles and guns at each other and divert those funds to developing the technology that will allow us to survive these inevitable natural disasters. We’ve got a handle on how to build earthquake resistant buildings, but they are not earthquake-proof. More importantly, our infrastructure is very vulnerable to many types of natural disasters.

We know this stuff happens. It has happened in the past and will again in the future. Two trillion dollars will go a long way to developing technology to study the planet we live on and understand what triggers these events. If we can’t stop them, at least we should be able to predict them reliably, and design our homes, businesses, cities and nations to withstand their onslaught.

Orbital Maneuvers is about multiple asteroid impacts on the United States. This is not beyond the realm of probability. It was scary researching this for the book, because it does not take a very big object to create global devastation. And, if not global, local devastation, which still can have global consequences. A small asteroid hitting the ocean is going to create tsunamis that could make the one that just hit Japan look like ripples on a pond.

So, we have a choice. We can keep preying on each other, burning money and resources to build offensive and defensive systems, and ignore the fact that there is a force out there more powerful than anything we have in our arsenals, or we can realize that this is the only place we have to live, and if we are going to survive, we have to join forces in building a common defense for everyone.

All the weapons, gadgets, toys and technology won’t mean a thing if Mother Nature reaches out and slaps you down. Just ask the people in Japan…

Till next time,

RC Davison

Take a Wild Ride on the Space Shuttle Discovery!

Well, actually, take a ride on the outside of Discovery on the solid rocket boosters (SRBs). NASA has 3 cameras on the SRBs: Forward (near the top of the SRB looking down); Intertank (near the top but facing the main fuel tank); Aft (near the bottom of the SRB looking up).

      The NASA video shows the launch from all three cameras on each booster. Each camera offers a unique perspective of the launch with the Intertank cameras providing the additional element of sound. It’s a wild ride anyway you look at it!

      Below is a list of key events on the video with their time-stamp if you don’t want to watch it real time. Some amazing footage to be sure!

STS-133 Launch SRB camera views:

SRB Left Forward Camera

  • 2:25 – SRB separation

  • 2:40 – Can see Discovery blazing on toward orbit

  • 5:30 – SRB starts to settle down under its drogue chute

  • 6:15 – Ocean surface detail can be seen

  • 6:40 – SRB engine nozzle extension is jettisoned and impacts the water about 7 seconds later.

  • 6:52 – The SRB hits the water

  • 7:40 – The SRB floats vertically in the water

SRB Left Aft Camera

  • 7:50 – The launch sequence repeats itself but with the camera view from the left SRB aft camera located near the bottom of the booster.

  • 10:10 – Booster separation (The video is clearer on this camera.)

  • 10:40 – Catch a glimpse of Discovery

  • 14:40 – Splash down

SRB Left Intertank Camera (with sound)

  • 14:45 – SRB left Intertank camera (Location looking at the ribbed side of the Main Fuel Tank). The video starts just before separation which occurs at:

  • 15:17 – Note the separation engines in the nose cone pushing the right SRB away from the shuttle.

  • 15:25 – Neat shot of right SRB as its engines sputter out

  • (Interesting to hear the pops, clicks, hisses, moans and groans of the SRB as it descends.)

  • 17:45 – You can see the exhaust trail from Discovery’s launch

  • 18:00 – Catch a view of Discovery moving into orbit.

  • 19:14 – Main chutes deploy at 19:23 as the reefing lines are cut opening to the first stage and at:

  • 19:30 – Chutes fully deployed

  • 19:45 – Impact on the surface

  • 20:20 – Can see the SRB nose cone parachuting toward the ocean

SRB Right Forward Camera

  • 20:32 – SRB Right Forward camera

  • 22:58 – SRB separation

  • 23:12 – Nice view of Discovery

  • 25:00 – SRB engine nozzle extension is jettisoned

  • 25:16 – Ocean impact

SRB Right Aft Camera

  • 25:45 – SRB Right Aft camera

  • 28:00 – SRB separation

  • 28:38 – SRB Right Intertank from the point of main chutes deployed

  • 28:46 – The chute reefing lines are cut and they open up more, slowing the booster

  • 28:53 – The chutes are fully deployed.

  • 29:09 – Splash down
    Hope you enjoyed the ride!!
    Till next time
    RC Davison

A Couple of Website Updates

Hi,

I just added a couple of new items to the website:

On the Home page you will find a link to an audio clip promo that was done for the book by Norm Sherman, who runs the Sci-Fi audio podcast site – Drabblecast.org.  Norm did a great job with the promo, as he does with the podcasts he produces for his site and others – check him out!

On the Space Station page, near the bottom you will find an image of the space station which is a link to a great animation of the assembly of the International Space Station on the USA TODAY website.  After the animation runs you have the ability to click on the names of each module on the right side to see more information and animations.

Lastly, for anyone that may have registered to get emails of new blog postings and have not been receiving them, please check the email address you entered, as I have gotten a number  notifications kicked back because of bad addresses.

Thanks for your support and enjoy!

Till next time,

RC Davison

Kepler – Expanding Our View of the Cosmos

Kepler’s been in the news lately, revealing some of its latest discoveries. At the time I’m writing this, Kepler has logged 1235 potential planets and 1879 eclipsing binary stars. Of the 1235 planetary candidates, 15 have been confirmed to be real planets. That may seem like a very small number, but it takes time to confirm these candidates with ground/space based telescopes. The number is sure to rise.

Kepler's Field of View - Image Courtesy of NASA

As I was looking at the Kepler site, it struck me as to how small Kepler’s view is of the entire sky. It covers an area of about 105 square degrees. Now that’s a pretty large area when you consider that our full Moon spans about a half a degree, and has an area of about .2 square degrees. But, if you think about it from the point of view of the entire visible sky, which covers 41,253 square degrees (encompassing both the northern and southern hemispheres), Kepler is only sampling 0.25% of the sky! If Kepler’s sample of our galaxy is typical of the entire galaxy, then we could expect a minimum of about 500,000 planets in the galaxy with equivalent short period orbits.

Kepler's Search Space - Image Courtesy of NASA

Remember that these planets pass between their stars and Kepler, so any star systems in which the planets rotate in a plane almost perpendicular to Kepler’s view would not be recorded. So, this rough number is even a smaller percentage of the potential total number of planets out there. Oh, and don’t forget about the moons that may orbit these planets (and others yet discovered) and could have atmospheres and environments conducive for life to form.

Out of these potential candidates, 68 are known to be Earth-sized and 288 fit the category of “super-earth”-size ­-­ 2-5 times the size of the Earth. These are all rocky-type planets, verses the gas giants like Jupiter. Some of these are also in or near the habitable zones of the stars they orbit. This is a region where temperatures on the planets would allow water to exist in a liquid state, essential for most life as we know it on Earth.

Almost two years of Kepler’s 3.5 year mission has passed, and it has documented 1235 planetary candidates. This means that these potential planets have passed in front of their parent stars at least 4 times in this two year period to provide reliable data to confirm that it’s a planet. In the next one-and-a-half years, more planets will be documented as they pass in front of their stars causing the star’s light to dim and allowing Kepler to record another transit. The longer Kepler looks at a star, the more planets it will see, because they are further from the star and have longer orbital periods.

Kepler's Mission - Image Courtesy of NASA

If Kepler were looking at our Sun, it would have already documented Mercury, because Mercury orbits the Sun every 88 days. (Actually it would have to be a much larger version of Mercury to be seen by Kepler.) Venus would also have been identified, with its orbital period of 224 days, three transits could have been recorded in two years. Earth could also be a likely candidate, but unconfirmed with two possible transits in the two year observation period. But, Kepler wouldn’t have anything more than possibly one transit for Mars and/or the other planets beyond it during this time period. With Jupiter’s orbital period of almost12 years, it would take 48 years for Kepler to gather enough data to confirm its existence.

The cosmos is teaming with planets, I have no doubt. I also think that the cosmos is teaming with life, in some shape or form. Our own experience with extremophiles here on Earth should be a good indication that life will find a way. How advanced that life is, is open to debate. Time will tell.

If you would like to participate in identifying potential planets from the data that Kepler has produced, take a look at the site: Planet Hunters. At the site you will go through some training and then will be able to identify transits that may indicate a planet passing in front of a star. A nice way to be able to participate in a profession astronomy project.

Transit Light Curves from Kepler's First 5 Planets - Image Courtesy of NASA

As always, comments and discussions are welcome.

Till next time,

RC Davison

The Colors of the Universe

We are often so amazed by the colorful images we see of nebulae, galaxies and other deep space objects that we may sometimes forget that these colors are not the natural colors, or at least not the colors we would see if viewed directly by the naked eye.

Part of the reason to color these objects so dramatically is to distinguish the different components of the object. That might be different elements or molecules, densities of matter or different energy levels, say from x-rays to infrared to gamma rays.

It really all comes down to the energy of the photons that the CCDs (use to be photographic film) receive. Typically these images are in black and white and are obtained by passing the light from the object through filters, which allow only certain frequencies or energies of electromagnetic radiation to reach the detector. Below are three images of the Eagle Nebula taken (from left to right) in the green, red and deep red parts of the visible spectrum:

Eagle Nebula - Green Light

Eagle Nebula - Red Light

Eagle Nebula -  Deep Red Light

 

 

You can see some subtle differences in the structure. Interesting, but not too exciting. But, if we assign colors to these filtered images so that the green light emitted by the doubly-ionized oxygen is blue, the red light from hydrogen is green and the deep red light from ionized sulfur is red. This helps to distinguish sulfur from hydrogen, which otherwise would both look red.

Eagle Nebula - OxygenEagle Nebula - HydrogenEagle Nebula - Sulfur

 

This is beginning to look a bit more interesting! Now, by blending these images into one we get the final product:

Eagle Nebula

These color choices show the bluish background of hydrogen and oxygen atoms surrounding the columns of dust and gas containing sulfur. Pretty to the eye and much more informative as to the components that make up the nebula.

These images come from a NASA site “Behind the Pictures”. Check it out. It won’t take long to go through the different pages that talk about using color as a tool, filters and the shapes of the images. There are also many more examples of how this process is applied to learn more about these amazing celestial objects.

Till next time,

RC Davison

Learning From The Challenger and Columbia Disasters

Friday, the 28th of January is the 25th anniversary of the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster. Hard to believe it was that long ago. As I’ve been watching the recent developments with the shuttle Discovery (STS-133), with the series of delays due to faulty valves early on and then the discovery of numerous cracked stringers in the external fuel tank, it’s got me wondering if we are seeing a repeat of the same mentality that caused the disasters with Challenger in 1986 and Columbia in 2003.

The O-ring problem on the solid rocket boosters that doomed Challenger first occurred on STS-2, the second flight of the shuttle Columbia that occurred on November 12, 1981. The problem was looked at by Thiokol, the company that designed the boosters, and they did some testing at elevated stress levels that turned up nothing, so it was written off as an anomaly. But, for the 15 shuttle launches that occurred between 1984 and the Challenger accident, all but three showed O-ring damage. It had not caused a problem up to that point and this deviation was normalized as routine—until January 28, 1986. The Challenger crew paid the cost of that behavior with their lives.

The same normalization of deviations applied to the foam and ice coming off the large external fuel tank that frequently pelted the shuttles, damaging their delicate ceramic tiles that form the heat shield for the vehicle. Foam falls off all the time, but it never caused a problem, so it must be okay to keep launching. February 1, 2003 proved that to be wrong when Columbia (STS-107) reentered the atmosphere with a hole in a leading edge carbon-carbon panel of the left wing, which allowed super-hot gases to destroy the structural integrity of the wing and the break up of the shuttle. Another crew paid the ultimate price for NASA accepting the abnormal as normal.

Today we are looking at the final launch of Discovery sometime towards the end of February 2011, postponed from the initial launch date back in November 2010. Did we get lucky this time? Could these cracked stringers in the main fuel tank have caused a failure of the tank as the shuttle raced into orbit? Equally important; is this a problem that has been there all along and it’s been accepted as the norm? I don’t know. I do know that I’m glad they found it and that repairs are under way to fix the problem. Hopefully we will see another successful mission for Discovery at the end of February. With the end of the shuttle program looming ever closer, NASA needs to be even more vigilant to ensure that the final missions launch and land without any problems.

If you want a nitty-gritty view of NASA from the inside, check out Mike Mullane’s book Riding Rockets. It gives you a peak behind the golden curtain NASA puts up for the general public. Very interesting.

Till next time,

RC Davison

The Orion Nebula

The European Southern Observatory has delivered one of the most beautiful images of the Orion Nebula that I’ve seen.

Orion Nebula from the European Southern Observatory

Using their 2.2 meter telescope at the Silia Observatory in Chile, with a series of 5 different filters, the image is close to what one would observe with the naked eye.  But, one needs to remember that the CCDs can collect photons of light over time and build up an image that we humans would not be able to see with the physiology of our eyes.  We wouldn’t be able to see the delicate gossamer structure with the subtle color changes that the CCD can.  So enjoy this beautiful image on your computer!

Orion is riding high in the cold winter night sky and one can easily see the Orion Nebula just below the belt of Orion on the constellation’s left side, as can be seen below.

Constellation of Orion - Credit: Mouser Williams

Orion harbors many wonders, including the red supergiant Betelgeuse marking his upper right shoulder and Rigel, a blue supergiant that marks Orion’s left foot.  Betelgeuse is so large that if placed at the center of our Solar System it would extend beyond Mars and the asteroid belt!  Another jewel that lies within the constellation is the Horsehead nebula, located near the left-most star making up Orion’s belt.

Horsehead Nebula in Orion - Wikimedia Commons

Next time you’re out and about at night, check out Orion, and if you have a pair of binoculars or a telescope available, take some time to check out the jewels that lie within the Orion constellation.

Till next time,

RC Davison